Did EdX Fail?

Home
News
Did edX Fail?

The MOOC platform created by Harvard and MIT was bought by 2U for $800 million. The move makes sense from a business perspective but some observers wonder what may need been.

In 2012, edX was founded as a nonprofit by scientists from MIT and Harvard. From the beginning, expectations were excessive for the platform that was designed to bring excessive-high quality training to the lots on-line totally free.

That very same yr massive open online programs had been recognized by The brand new York Instances, which dubbed 2012 “The yr of the MOOC” in an article about edX and its for-profit competitors. “The shimmery hope is that free courses can bring one of the best schooling on the planet to essentially the most distant corners of the planet, assist folks of their careers, and increase mental and personal networks,” the Times wrote.

‘Throwing Spaghetti at the Wall’

By 2013, edX had reached greater than 1 million students. However yet, edX programs and different MOOCS have been plagued by the issues with on-line studying which have turn into all too acquainted to educators over the past 12 months-and-a-half, together with low completion rates and lack of engagement from students.

As a nonprofit, edX had much less funding and less ability to beat these obstacles than Coursera, which was based in 2012 by Stanford University pc science professors Andrew Ng and Daphne Koller.

Over time, Coursera developed a business mannequin primarily based on providing paid certificates and partnering with universities to pursue degrees on the platform. edX tried comparable applications however had hassle holding pace.

“I suppose they had been slower to scale then Coursera was and they'd fewer degree choices,” says Sean Gallagher, executive director of the center for the long run of upper Training & Expertise Strategy at Northeastern University.

“They by no means had a strategy, they simply stored throwing spaghetti in opposition to the wall and seeing what sticks,” mentioned Phil Hill, an edtech advisor and author of the Phil on Ed Tech weblog. (opens in new tab) “They had Coursera envy and tried to match Coursera's preliminary business plan, despite the fact that Coursera had much increased funding and a a lot simpler to make use of platform. They didn't take heed to their college partners on what they wanted.”

Unable to Sustain Pandemic Momentum

Even so, when the pandemic hit and training -- and so many different points of everyone’s life -- went online, all the major MOOC suppliers loved a major surge. edX’s enrollments (opens in new tab) rose from 81 million in 2019 to one hundred ten million by the tip of 2020.

This pandemic-fueled success is part of why the edtech world was surprised by the announcement (opens in new tab) that 2U, which contracts with nonprofit faculties and universities to supply online degree applications, was shopping for edX for $800 million from Harvard and MIT. The universities will use the money from the sale to fund a nonprofit that can examine training.

Whereas some observers in increased ed bemoaned the sale (opens in new tab), it makes sense from a business perspective as the companies complement each other, says Gallagher. 2U makes a speciality of partnerships with universities for levels and certificates, an space during which edX fell behind Coursera, and 2U will benefit from the model recognition and prestige of edX.

“Part of the rationale for QU is that they are going to be in a position to acquire potential college students more efficiently,” Gallagher says. “Think about it as a large funnel. At the top of that funnel, you've got tens of millions of people who find themselves registered, or accomplished, or actively enrolled in these programs. If you can get a fraction of 1 p.c of them to enroll in a faculty program, that is a stable enterprise model.”

Gallagher says that the overwhelming majority of students enrolled in edX programs don’t know whether MIT or Harvard are nonprofit institutions to start with and the distinction doesn’t always matter. “The reality is, most faculties and universities in in the present day's surroundings have to operate with a surplus and they should have a market orientation,” he says.

But Hill sees the shift from a nonprofit to the personal sector as marking the top of an era for edX.

“It actually did not obtain what it set out to attain,” Hill says. “I'm seeing loads of frustration from university companions who really viewed it as going to be a college collaboration to innovate new teaching methods and share research, and it undoubtedly did not try this.”

“It's difficult for nonprofits to compete, however who says a nonprofit should compete? They had an opportunity to be completely different and never attempt to be Coursera. And they selected not to go that route,” he says. “I do not suspect we'll be speaking about edX much in 5 years. It is going to be rebranded by that time is my guess.”

Digital Reality Teaching: Successes and Challenges (opens in new tab)

Analysis: Video Studying May be More effective Than In-particular person Lectures (opens in new tab)


Erik Ofgang is Tech & Studying's senior employees author. A journalist, author (opens in new tab) and educator, his work has appeared within the Washington Put up, The Atlantic, and Associated Press. He presently teaches at Western Connecticut State University’s MFA program. Whereas a workers writer at Connecticut Magazine he received a Society of Skilled Journalism Award for his training reporting. He's fascinated with how humans learn and the way technology can make that more practical.